<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Low maintenance back yards in San Francisco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.burbed.com/2009/04/23/low-maintenance-back-yards-in-san-francisco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.burbed.com/2009/04/23/low-maintenance-back-yards-in-san-francisco/</link>
	<description>San Francisco Bay Area, Silicon Valley House Price and Mortgage Insanity Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:07:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nomadic</title>
		<link>http://www.burbed.com/2009/04/23/low-maintenance-back-yards-in-san-francisco/#comment-30827</link>
		<dc:creator>nomadic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 06:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbed.com/?p=3306#comment-30827</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re asking him to &lt;b&gt;think?&lt;/b&gt;

Get ahold of yourself man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re asking him to <b>think?</b></p>
<p>Get ahold of yourself man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.burbed.com/2009/04/23/low-maintenance-back-yards-in-san-francisco/#comment-30826</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbed.com/?p=3306#comment-30826</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s delve a little more.

I don&#039;t know if this is true, but Mr. Mortgage says: &quot;“Defaults on original loan amounts over $750k are surging with total counts higher than total sales in this segment. Supply from foreclosure is about to hit hard in the mid-to-upper end housing market. And remember, foreclosure supply is only one form and account for only about 35% of total supply.”&quot;

Think about that.  Defaults on 750k+ loans are going UP.  Then think about how long it takes to process a default and subsequent foreclosure.  Finally, understand why it is taking so long and why it will occur for an extended period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s delve a little more.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if this is true, but Mr. Mortgage says: &#8220;“Defaults on original loan amounts over $750k are surging with total counts higher than total sales in this segment. Supply from foreclosure is about to hit hard in the mid-to-upper end housing market. And remember, foreclosure supply is only one form and account for only about 35% of total supply.”&#8221;</p>
<p>Think about that.  Defaults on 750k+ loans are going UP.  Then think about how long it takes to process a default and subsequent foreclosure.  Finally, understand why it is taking so long and why it will occur for an extended period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.burbed.com/2009/04/23/low-maintenance-back-yards-in-san-francisco/#comment-30825</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbed.com/?p=3306#comment-30825</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s recap:

You said this comment was laughable:

&gt;&gt;Has he finally accepted the defeat now that his RE predictions in 2008 have been decisively proven wrong by the market ?

Your predictions were for business as it had been.  I remember you shitting some &#039;clear for takeoff language.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s recap:</p>
<p>You said this comment was laughable:</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;Has he finally accepted the defeat now that his RE predictions in 2008 have been decisively proven wrong by the market ?</p>
<p>Your predictions were for business as it had been.  I remember you shitting some &#8216;clear for takeoff language.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Estater</title>
		<link>http://www.burbed.com/2009/04/23/low-maintenance-back-yards-in-san-francisco/#comment-30824</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Estater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbed.com/?p=3306#comment-30824</guid>
		<description>anon says,
&gt;&gt;&lt;i&gt;This kind of laughable comment is clearly written by someone who does not have the capacity to think!&lt;/i&gt;

In that case, you must be that person, because you answered as follows:

&gt;&gt;Has CA real estate corrected itself, yet ?

&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Not quite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anon says,<br />
&gt;&gt;<i>This kind of laughable comment is clearly written by someone who does not have the capacity to think!</i></p>
<p>In that case, you must be that person, because you answered as follows:</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;Has CA real estate corrected itself, yet ?</p>
<p><i><b>Not quite.</b></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://www.burbed.com/2009/04/23/low-maintenance-back-yards-in-san-francisco/#comment-30823</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbed.com/?p=3306#comment-30823</guid>
		<description>I always pity those people living in average SF shacks, they could just live in the same kind of dumpster in any other run-down town and pay 1/3 the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always pity those people living in average SF shacks, they could just live in the same kind of dumpster in any other run-down town and pay 1/3 the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.burbed.com/2009/04/23/low-maintenance-back-yards-in-san-francisco/#comment-30822</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbed.com/?p=3306#comment-30822</guid>
		<description>&quot;This kind of laughable comment is clearly written by someone who does not live in the Real Bay Area!&quot;

This kind of laughable comment is clearly written by someone who does not have the capacity to think!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This kind of laughable comment is clearly written by someone who does not live in the Real Bay Area!&#8221;</p>
<p>This kind of laughable comment is clearly written by someone who does not have the capacity to think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nomadic</title>
		<link>http://www.burbed.com/2009/04/23/low-maintenance-back-yards-in-san-francisco/#comment-30821</link>
		<dc:creator>nomadic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbed.com/?p=3306#comment-30821</guid>
		<description>A, it&#039;s called Title 24 - it&#039;s statewide in CA:
http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/

I haven&#039;t checked out the kitchen requirements in detail but I do know that the primary light source must be &quot;high efficiency&quot; which basically means fluorescent.  They don&#039;t allow screw in bulbs because you could swap out the bulb after the inspector leaves.  Just the fact that a regular bulb &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; go in there is a problem.

In bathrooms they give you a little more leeway - it&#039;s fluorescent lighting OR you can use a special switch that turns on manually but will shut off automatically after a maximum of 15 minutes; it has a motion sensor so it won&#039;t turn off if someone is in there (but it doesn&#039;t see through glass shower walls, so careful how long you stay in there).

The lighting regulations vary by room, and yes, it&#039;s a royal PITA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A, it&#8217;s called Title 24 &#8211; it&#8217;s statewide in CA:<br />
<a href="http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/" rel="nofollow">http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/</a></p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t checked out the kitchen requirements in detail but I do know that the primary light source must be &#8220;high efficiency&#8221; which basically means fluorescent.  They don&#8217;t allow screw in bulbs because you could swap out the bulb after the inspector leaves.  Just the fact that a regular bulb <i>can</i> go in there is a problem.</p>
<p>In bathrooms they give you a little more leeway &#8211; it&#8217;s fluorescent lighting OR you can use a special switch that turns on manually but will shut off automatically after a maximum of 15 minutes; it has a motion sensor so it won&#8217;t turn off if someone is in there (but it doesn&#8217;t see through glass shower walls, so careful how long you stay in there).</p>
<p>The lighting regulations vary by room, and yes, it&#8217;s a royal PITA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.burbed.com/2009/04/23/low-maintenance-back-yards-in-san-francisco/#comment-30820</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbed.com/?p=3306#comment-30820</guid>
		<description>Gosh, my cat door IS in the person door (not the big door). Now I&#039;m worried it&#039;s a fire hazard - is that b/c the door itself is considered a firewall, so making a hole in it reduces it&#039;s firewall capabilities?

Well THAT&#039;S disappointing. I guess the city inspector just missed it while he was looking at other stuff - he was quite a stickler about some items.

For example - the overhead kitchen light was this cheap fluorescent ring in a white plastic diffuser, that I didn&#039;t like. I got a different cheap fixture from home depot - which had an Edison-type (screw-in) lamp base, and I put in a soft-white compact fluorescent bulb, and the diffuser was frosted glass instead of plastic. I thought it was a little nicer.

The inspector said Edison-based screw-in bulbs are verboten. It MUST be pin-based. I switched it back and he signed off for the prop. mgmt. company on his next visit. This sucks! There are very few bulb choices I found for pin-based lamp fixtures.

I think it&#039;s supposed to be an energy-saving code - but I was able to put in a very low wattage compact fluorescent bulb in the screw-in base, so I was actually SAVING 2 watts vs. the one they had.

He wouldn&#039;t even explain the code, though - he just said &#039;it must be pin-based&#039; and moved on.

New-home-building must be fun with all these regulations to live by!

Is this some crappy local city code? Are you really restricted to pin-based fluorescent lighting for ALL your overhead stuff? You can&#039;t have any incandescent or halogen or &#039;other&#039; lights anymore and be up to code?

Please tell me I&#039;m mistaken...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, my cat door IS in the person door (not the big door). Now I&#8217;m worried it&#8217;s a fire hazard &#8211; is that b/c the door itself is considered a firewall, so making a hole in it reduces it&#8217;s firewall capabilities?</p>
<p>Well THAT&#8217;S disappointing. I guess the city inspector just missed it while he was looking at other stuff &#8211; he was quite a stickler about some items.</p>
<p>For example &#8211; the overhead kitchen light was this cheap fluorescent ring in a white plastic diffuser, that I didn&#8217;t like. I got a different cheap fixture from home depot &#8211; which had an Edison-type (screw-in) lamp base, and I put in a soft-white compact fluorescent bulb, and the diffuser was frosted glass instead of plastic. I thought it was a little nicer.</p>
<p>The inspector said Edison-based screw-in bulbs are verboten. It MUST be pin-based. I switched it back and he signed off for the prop. mgmt. company on his next visit. This sucks! There are very few bulb choices I found for pin-based lamp fixtures.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s supposed to be an energy-saving code &#8211; but I was able to put in a very low wattage compact fluorescent bulb in the screw-in base, so I was actually SAVING 2 watts vs. the one they had.</p>
<p>He wouldn&#8217;t even explain the code, though &#8211; he just said &#8216;it must be pin-based&#8217; and moved on.</p>
<p>New-home-building must be fun with all these regulations to live by!</p>
<p>Is this some crappy local city code? Are you really restricted to pin-based fluorescent lighting for ALL your overhead stuff? You can&#8217;t have any incandescent or halogen or &#8216;other&#8217; lights anymore and be up to code?</p>
<p>Please tell me I&#8217;m mistaken&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Estater</title>
		<link>http://www.burbed.com/2009/04/23/low-maintenance-back-yards-in-san-francisco/#comment-30819</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Estater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbed.com/?p=3306#comment-30819</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Has he finally accepted the defeat now that his RE predictions in 2008 have been decisively proven wrong by the market ?&lt;/i&gt;

This kind of laughable comment is clearly written by someone who does not live in the Real Bay Area!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;<i>Has he finally accepted the defeat now that his RE predictions in 2008 have been decisively proven wrong by the market ?</i></p>
<p>This kind of laughable comment is clearly written by someone who does not live in the Real Bay Area!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nomadic</title>
		<link>http://www.burbed.com/2009/04/23/low-maintenance-back-yards-in-san-francisco/#comment-30818</link>
		<dc:creator>nomadic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbed.com/?p=3306#comment-30818</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not dead yet!  (But I should be.)

Can you tell I don&#039;t have to go to work tomorrow?
:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not dead yet!  (But I should be.)</p>
<p>Can you tell I don&#8217;t have to go to work tomorrow? <img src='http://www.burbed.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

