Comments on: House that lost value in Palo Alto. OMG.

By: DreamT

DreamT — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:07:43 +0000

steve – such is the fate of properties featured on burbed. That house could move to a better zip, it still would carry that heavy past with it.

By: steve

steve — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:00:46 +0000

The price for the following listing(s) has changed since the last search was done.

mls#:80918726
new:$1,160,000
original:$1,230,000
status:Active
addr:994 LOMA VERDE AV, Palo Alto, CA 94303

By: sonarrat

sonarrat — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:51:16 +0000

I live on a “residential arterial” in Evergreen. It’s two lanes with no yellow line, but it serves about 500 homes directly and joins two important east-west throughfares. It’s nowhere near as busy as Middlefield or University in PA, but during the rush hour it gets a steady flow of cars. Because of their high visibility and good foot traffic, such properties are typically best as home businesses or rentals. There are three home businesses (including mine) that I know of on the same short block, and I’m sure there are more. If I wasn’t running a business out of my home, I would definitely pay a little extra to be off that street.

By: DreamT

DreamT — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:44:14 +0000

“no one besides a buyer from palo alto would know what the heck they are talking about”
Come on now. Anybody driving Middlefield on a weekend notices LV, since there are only 4-5 such thoroughfares in PA. You don’t need to live in Palo Alto, you just need a set of eyeballs and a reason to visit Palo Alto at times.

By: cardinal2007

cardinal2007 — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:38:29 +0000

Maybe they were thinking about what the name means in Spanish, a small hill in the middle of a field or meadow, that happens to be green. I guess this place does not fit the definition. I think if there were a house on a loma overlooking south PA it might be kind of cool.

By: palo alto resident

palo alto resident — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:35:27 +0000

Loma Verde is a main thoroughfare/connector street for that part of Palo Alto. I don’t know why the agent bothered to put the LV disclaimer in the listing, no one besides a buyer from palo alto would know what the heck they are talking about, nor figure it out upon viewing the property.

By: anon

anon — Sun, 24 May 2009 14:56:56 +0000

lol excreter: are you constantly laughed at in real life as well?

By: DreamT

DreamT — Sun, 24 May 2009 07:34:40 +0000

yes, Pralay’s #51 is a pretty good post

By: Pralay

Pralay — Sun, 24 May 2009 07:06:37 +0000

This is going to be the final sign of a recovery: Pralay goes to see his first open house!
——

LOL! I never realized that RealExcreter would establish himself as a proven pathological liar so easily for one more time.

Pralay did not go to open house. Therefore, RealExcreter’s statement is a LIE.

That makes “final sign of a recovery” FALSE too. And don’t forget it is final – you won’t see any recovery sign anymore.

By: Pralay

Pralay — Sun, 24 May 2009 06:54:07 +0000

More proof RE is a lazy troll without a single fact to back him up. ------ Of course! He never brings a single fact to back him up. Instead he pulls something from his ass and tries to sell it as fact. Not long ago when I mentioned about Palo Alto inventory level, he declared:

Let me give you the quick layman’s version: Majority of the accumulated inventory is in the stratosphere price range.

When I showed him from mlslisting in #75 that majority of PA inventory are not in "stratosphere price range" as he claimed, he did not bother to backup his statement. Another in same thread. When I mentioned about Cupertino inventory level, pulled something from his ass without doing any basic research:

How much of that inventory is due to Rancho Rickydinky area? Is there much inventory under a million?