Comments on: Bay Area home prices, sales rise

By: Pralay

Pralay — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 03:56:18 +0000

how can you say that? he made me laugh out loud.
—-

He is natural born genius who does not know how much entertainment value he provides.

By: DreamT

DreamT — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 01:42:46 +0000

That makes him an invaluable contributor

By: nomadic

nomadic — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 01:23:05 +0000

how can you say that? he made me laugh out loud.

By: DreamT

DreamT — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 00:46:50 +0000

“with none of the qualities that make a Palo Alto home.”

The poster has none of the qualities that make a valuable burbed contributor.

By: nomadic

nomadic — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 00:19:53 +0000

…with none of the qualities that make a Palo Alto home.

Except that fact that it is, in fact, in Palo Alto. I know houses get tossed out of the RBA regularly, but cities don’t tend to toss homes out of their community.

Thanks for the laugh.

By: Real Estater

Real Estater — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:16:25 +0000

Juiceman,

Isn’t that what they said about the stock market?

By: Juiceman

Juiceman — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:35:38 +0000

I’ve got some news for those of you waiting for house prices to “rebound” – that ain’t gonna happen for 10 years minimum. What’s happening here is that real estate prices are slowly stabilizing, and sales are catching up to form an equilibrium with the inventories. Prices will be right around these near-bottom levels for a long time, so don’t go trying to flip properties any time soon.
Otherwise, this is obviously good to hear.

By: Pralay

Pralay — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:41:18 +0000

California no longer has double digit appreciation for property values. Big deal! But at least we have double digit unemployment (officially).

By: Pralay

Pralay — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:23:53 +0000

Once again, we’re talking X, and you’re talking about Y and Z.
—-

Good to see that you know that X, Y, Z are different letters. That’s quite an improvement for someone who cannot even spell correctly.

By: Pralay

Pralay — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:20:45 +0000

You failed to read the context. We’re not just talking about RBA housing per se. This kind of figure contributes to the national recovery that Obama/Geithner are talking about.
—–

National recovery? Useless aggregate data.