Mountain View–Los Altos teachers are best paid in state
Report: MVLA teachers are best paid in state
by Kelsey Mesher
Mountain View Voice StaffAccording to data released by the state Department of Education this month and compiled by the Sacramento Bee, teachers in the Mountain View-Los Altos High School District are the highest paid in the state.
"We have the best teachers in the state and they deserve to be paid well," said Superintendent Barry Groves.
The Bee’s report, which examined districts with more than 100 teachers, said MVLA pays an average of $95,365 a year, with the lowest earning $61,184 and the highest $115,616.
…
According to the state data, teachers in the Mountain View Whisman School District make an average of $61,147 annually. The lowest pay offered in that district is $44,609, while the highest is $82,315.
In the Los Altos School District, teachers earn between $44,832 and $86,924, with an average salary of $73,569.
Congrats to Mountain View and Los Altos for this achievement! No wonder we have some of the best schools in California!
Now, granted, teachers in NY, NJ, and CT suburbs with lower priced housing regularly make over $100k – but let’s face it, they don’t have the right priorities. That’s why their schools are only top of the nation, not top of California.
Prisons and bus drivers. California’s got everything right.
(BTW, be sure to check out the comments at the bottom of the link above. Lots of good discussion.)
July 18th, 2010 at 11:28 am
It may be high, but their top-out isn’t the highest in the state. That’s $119,657 in King City (link goes to the Sac Bee database.) And they’ve lost their accreditation and been taken over by the state.
See Mountain View–you have something to aspire to.
July 18th, 2010 at 12:07 pm
Not bad for nine months’ work each year.
July 18th, 2010 at 12:09 pm
This is a strange issue. On the one hand, so many tout that RBA homes are worth millions and double every 10 years or sooner. On the other hand, so many want to complain that a teacher’s salary is 1/10 of the cost of a million dollar home. In terms of purchase price to average teacher’s salary, it’s well over 10x for most RBA teachers. Basically homes are valuable, but teachers are not as valuable, yet some claim that the fine schools, a fine education underpins, at least in part, the greatness of the RBA. There might be sushi in Fremont, but that’s not part of the RBA, since homes are not valuable in most of the East Bay.
It’s similar for other public servants, such as police. What’s the average San Jose home price-to-average income ratio of a San Jose Police Officer. Yes, I fully realize that many officers live outside of the city because of high housing costs–are officers paid too little, or are housing prices too high? I know, I know, housing prices are too low and officers are paid too much. It does not matter that most public servants cannot afford the homes in the area. We need not worry about demand, people’s ability to buy, and so on. The only thing that needs to be considered is that in the RBA homes double in price every 10 years or sooner, no matter what’s happening in the labor market, and that’s not to even consider the financial markets–but then again, if it’s in the RBA, there’s plenty of investment cash available.
July 18th, 2010 at 4:33 pm
It looks like the teachers commenting on the original article also suffer from the Dunning-Kruger effect (thank you madhaus for posting this a few days ago, it was quite interesting).
I think the teachers are paid appropriately.
July 18th, 2010 at 5:26 pm
I think the teachers are paid appropriately.
Which ones, groomer? There appears to be quite a range, depending on district.
Different ranges based on age group make sense to me, but even that would make an interesting debate. (Whether the better paid teachers should be the ones working with little kids in their formative years, or the ones who have the challenges of prepping older ones for college.)
July 18th, 2010 at 8:10 pm
Did you notice the comment in the MVV article that said a few Palo Alto addresses went to MV-Whisman or Los Altos school districts? I can guess where the LA ones are (mountains) but where are the MVW addresses? Next to Charleston?
July 19th, 2010 at 6:43 am
Most of the condos on San Antonio go to Mountain View schools despite having Palo Alto addresses. They petitioned to get into PAUSD but failed. The school district has no room for them.
July 19th, 2010 at 5:24 pm
Ahhh… another school article.
July 19th, 2010 at 5:28 pm
I grew up in Los Altos and was in the Cupertino Union School District. It just depends on where you live…
July 19th, 2010 at 6:08 pm
> Dunning-Kruger effect
“unskilled person makes poor decisions and reaches erroneous conclusions, but their incompetence denies them the metacognitive ability to realize their mistakes.[1] The unskilled therefore suffer from illusory superiority, rating their own ability as above average, much higher than it actually”
That sounds like RealEstater!
July 19th, 2010 at 10:40 pm
OK, guys. Ready to smear some eggs on Pralay’s face?
It’s time to face the music again, and do another follow-up. 585 N California was sold for $1.8M, well over the $1.35M asking price.
July 19th, 2010 at 10:45 pm
> 585 N California was sold for $1.8M, well over the $1.35M asking price.
This would never happen on the other side of Middlefield
July 19th, 2010 at 10:49 pm
Real Estater- “585 N California was sold for $1.8M, well over the $1.35M asking price.”
What kind of REALTOR/seller prices so far under fair market value?
July 19th, 2010 at 10:52 pm
SEA,
Do you think a realtor in your neighborhood dares to try this trick?
July 19th, 2010 at 10:53 pm
It’s time to face the music again, and do another follow-up. 585 N California was sold for $1.8M, well over the $1.35M asking price.
—-
And how exactly it validates your claim “30 offers for $1.7M cash”?
July 19th, 2010 at 10:55 pm
Do you think a realtor in your neighborhood dares to try this trick?
—-
Do you think your own house, which is in the wrong side of Middlefield, can do the trick?
July 19th, 2010 at 10:56 pm
What I am asking is how did the REALTOR/seller miss the mark so far? I love buying property from people that price so low.
July 19th, 2010 at 10:59 pm
Maybe they should have asked for $1.8M and hoped for $2.0M?
July 19th, 2010 at 11:01 pm
>>Do you think your own house, which is in the wrong side of Middlefield, can do the trick?
If I list my house for $1.8M, it will sell in 1 week. No trick required.
July 19th, 2010 at 11:03 pm
Another success story in Palo Alto:
Seven days was all it took. Accepting an all-cash offer, Isobel Sheehan sold her Palo Alto townhouse recently for nearly $900,000, joining other Bay Area homeowners who’ve begun to come in from the recessionary cold.
July 19th, 2010 at 11:05 pm
If I list my house for $1.8M, it will sell in 1 week. No trick required.
—-
When you say “no trick required”, I assume you are implying “my house CANNOT do the same trick”.
July 19th, 2010 at 11:05 pm
“If I list my house for $1.8M, it will sell in 1 week”
I don’t think so. But a couple of your neighbors may definitely make that claim.
July 19th, 2010 at 11:14 pm
“Another success story in Palo Alto:
Seven days was all it took. Accepting an all-cash offer, Isobel Sheehan sold her Palo Alto townhouse recently for nearly $900,000, joining other Bay Area homeowners who’ve begun to come in from the recessionary cold.”
How much was it worth?
July 19th, 2010 at 11:21 pm
>>How much was it worth?
Apparently, $900K.
July 19th, 2010 at 11:25 pm
How much was it worth?
And which side of Middlefield was it on?
July 19th, 2010 at 11:29 pm
>>I don’t think so. But a couple of your neighbors may definitely make that claim.
It doesn’t really matter what you think, does it? 94301 has been immune to the downturn. Majority of the homes are selling at within 10% of the peak period. The graph you showed is for amateurs. The apparent drop in the graph is due to the fact that lower priced homes made up of majority of the transactions during the downturn period. A graph is generally a bad way to measure 94301 anyways, because sales volume is generally quite low, and every home is different.
July 19th, 2010 at 11:32 pm
>>And which side of Middlefield was it on?
A spherical object does not have right or left side, you idiot.
July 19th, 2010 at 11:37 pm
Guys,
How much more evidence do you need that now is a great time to take on a mortgage? The reason folks on the sidelines are jumping in now is because it really doesn’t get better than this. Nobody wants to look back 1 year from now and regret not catching the moment of opportunity. Stay tuned, you’ll see higher rates as well as higher prices by this time next year.
July 19th, 2010 at 11:38 pm
RE, by your own admission you own a low-priced property in your neighborhood (rising tide lifts all boats, etc.), so my comment is very much relevant.
As for your cheap attack, when I choose to comment on your thinking abilities, you’ll be welcome to state your opinion, until then please stay on topic – real estate – and be decent.
July 19th, 2010 at 11:41 pm
Lol – Every house in 94301 is unique and special. Like snowflakes. Or realtors. Or middle managers.
July 19th, 2010 at 11:50 pm
DreamT,
Are you really that clueless? The term “low priced home” on my street does not have the same meaning as on your street.
July 19th, 2010 at 11:51 pm
Now that we know the place was worth $900k. How much should the REALTOR, a paid professional, and the buyer, who seeks to maximize selling price, priced it?
July 19th, 2010 at 11:52 pm
And every neighborhood in 94301 also has worthless graphs because every neighborhood in 94301 has low-priced homes that are down much much more than 10%. By definition, every neighborhood has a lowest quartile, and I guess that’s where #26 lives. Since the peak was in 2008, that means the homes are down more than 20%. You know, the “icing.”
July 19th, 2010 at 11:52 pm
>>Every house in 94301 is unique and special.
That’s literally true. You will have to search very hard to find a home that is not unique in this zip. I’m pretty sure there is exactly 1 copy of my own home.
July 19th, 2010 at 11:55 pm
>>Now that we know the place was worth $900k. How much should the REALTOR, a paid professional, and the buyer, who seeks to maximize selling price, priced it?
A home is worth what the market will bear. A paid, professional realtor will price a home so that market forces will determine the worth of the home.
July 19th, 2010 at 11:56 pm
I’m pretty sure there is exactly 1 copy of my own home.
Are you sure? It looks a lot like today’s featured house.
July 19th, 2010 at 11:57 pm
“The term “low priced home” on my street does not have the same meaning as on your street.”
Oh yes it does, sir. It means your neighbors’ house would, in the average, sell for rather more than yours if you concurrently placed it on the market. Some for 3M or 4M. Yours wouldn’t get $1.8M today.
If you disagree, disprove it.
July 19th, 2010 at 11:57 pm
>>because every neighborhood in 94301 has low-priced homes that are down much much more than 10%.
If you can find such a home, I suggest you buy it now before the crowd recognizes the existence of such value.
July 19th, 2010 at 11:58 pm
A paid, professional realtor will price a home so that market forces will determine the worth of the home.
Wrong, #35. A paid, professional realtor will price a home to generate the fastest commission.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:00 am
>>because every neighborhood in 94301 has low-priced homes that are down much much more than 10%.
If you can find such a home, I suggest you buy it now before the crowd recognizes the existence of such value.
What crowd? The “crowd” cannot afford your $1.8M wishing price, or the $1.55M it’s probably worth.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:01 am
>>If you disagree, disprove it.
It’s not that I disagree, but that I’m not sure what the hell you’re saying. If my neighbors’ homes can sell for $3M to $4M, why is it mine cannot sell for $1.8M if placed concurrently on the market? If anything, mine will sell faster, because tons of people want to buy into a high value street at a low price.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:03 am
If your logic is tenable at $1.8M, it would also be tenable at $2.8M, wouldn’t it? Does it make your property worth $2.8M then?
July 20th, 2010 at 12:11 am
madhaus,
Tell you what. I won’t sell my home even if you pay me $2M, because it’s just too hard to find a replacement for such combination of home, location, and lot size in Palo Alto.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:12 am
DreamT,
Speak English.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:16 am
madhaus,
I hate to break it to you, but…I have it all. My home is excellent to live in; it is affordable for 94301, and yet I can double its value in the future by building a new home on the lot. The formula is basically: build equity now; make big bucks later. I can go to sleep smiling every night if I think about it.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:20 am
RealEstater, is “tenable” bothering you? or is it “worth“?
July 20th, 2010 at 12:21 am
>>And which side of Middlefield was it on?
A spherical object does not have right or left side, you idiot.
—-
Thanks for excellent knowledge of geometry. I didn’t know that a straight road could be spherical.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:22 am
DreamT,
Speak English.
—-
Translation: I am unable to comprehend.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:27 am
The graph you showed is for amateurs. The apparent drop in the graph is due to the fact that lower priced homes made up of majority of the transactions during the downturn period.
—-
Median price (and its graph) was “reliable method” for measuring market, until the graph started going downhill.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:27 am
>>Thanks for excellent knowledge of geometry. I didn’t know that a straight road could be spherical.
A straight road does not lie on the earth. Thanks for the laughs, Pralay.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:29 am
A straight road does not lie on the earth. Thanks for the laughs, Pralay.
—-
Straight or bended, still does not make it “spherical”.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:32 am
Pralay says,
>>Median price (and its graph) was “reliable method” for measuring market, until the graph started going downhill.
Stupid Pralay, this is what I wrote:
However, if you follow the median consistently, it gives you a good clue about what are the values of the homes that actually transacted.
This is entirely consistent with what I wrote in #26:
The apparent drop in the graph is due to the fact that lower priced homes made up of majority of the transactions during the downturn period.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:33 am
Pralay says,
>>Straight or bended, still does not make it “spherical”.
Palo Alto must be more special than I thought. Roads do not follow the shape of the earth.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:37 am
and yet I can double its value in the future by building a new home on the lot.
—-
I guess that’s the only hope you have.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:38 am
Palo Alto must be more special than I thought. Roads do not follow the shape of the earth
—–
Just because Earth is spherical, it does not make Palo Alto or its road spherical. Just ask your own kid.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:39 am
Wow, homes in Palo Alto are on non-Euclidean streets. Is that what you get for an extra million? Room to swagger?
July 20th, 2010 at 12:45 am
This is entirely consistent with what I wrote in #26:
—–
No, this is what you said one and half years back:
There is only one consistency here – you use numbers when it fits, otherwise you refute it saying graphs/stats are for “amateurs”.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:45 am
Post 45 is lol. Reproduced below for posterity:
“I hate to break it to you, but…I have it all. My home is excellent to live in; it is affordable for 94301, and yet I can double its value in the future by building a new home on the lot. The formula is basically: build equity now; make big bucks later. I can go to sleep smiling every night if I think about it.” – Real Estater
July 20th, 2010 at 12:50 am
I hate to break it to you, but…I have it all. My home is excellent to live in; it is affordable for 94301, and yet I can double its value in the future by building a new home on the lot. The formula is basically: build equity now; make big bucks later. I can go to sleep smiling every night if I think about it.
You have it all, #45? You’d be surprised how others see it.
Back on the bottom line
Diggin’ for a lousy dime
And if I hit the mother lode
I’d cover anything that showed
whoa ooh oh
I don’t care what you do…
You know, I can go to sleep smiling if I helped my family or a friend or my community, or if I shared some music I made, or wrote something that made someone smile and they took the trouble to let me know.
Somehow tearing my house down in hope of doubling its value just doesn’t do the same thing for me. And somehow, I don’t think I’m the one missing something here.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:51 am
Wow, homes in Palo Alto are on non-Euclidean streets. Is that what you get for an extra million? Room to swagger?
—–
Everything is spherical in RBA. Just another erroneous conclusion by someone who is suffering from
Dunning–Kruger effect.
July 20th, 2010 at 12:59 am
Post 45 is lol. Reproduced below for posterity:
July 20th, 2010 at 1:03 am
“And somehow, I don’t think I’m the one missing something here.”
Maybe he’s missing this?
July 20th, 2010 at 1:16 am
Nobody wants to look back 1 year from now and regret not catching the moment of opportunity. Stay tuned, you’ll see higher rates as well as higher prices by this time next year.
—–
Thanks for shameless sales pitch. We heard that “you-will-get-priced-out-next-year” before.
2008
More in 2008:
2009:
We will wait for Real Estater’s forecast next year too – to tell us that if potential buyers don’t buy in 2011, they are going to regret in 2012.
July 20th, 2010 at 1:22 am
“And somehow, I don’t think I’m the one missing something here.”
Maybe he’s missing this?
—–
Real Estater flushed El Nino using Drano.
July 20th, 2010 at 7:30 am
Pralay,
Let me ask you again. Is India on the right side of the globe or the wrong side?
July 20th, 2010 at 7:33 am
Note: In #65, I’m not talking about directions.
July 20th, 2010 at 7:46 am
Real Estater- “A home is worth what the market will bear. A paid, professional realtor will price a home so that market forces will determine the worth of the home.” (#35)
Then what’s the big deal with an overbid?
This reminds me of that big online auction site–One person starts the bidding at $1 and another one starts the bidding at $75 for identical $100 items. The $1 starting price auction gets bid up $99 and the $75 starting price auction gets bid up $25. So what?
July 20th, 2010 at 7:51 am
Real Estater- “Let me ask you again. Is India on the right side of the globe or the wrong side?”
Left, maybe?
July 20th, 2010 at 8:01 am
it’s hilarious people actually believe real estater lives in palo alto. lololol.
July 20th, 2010 at 8:27 am
Let me ask you again. Is India on the right side of the globe or the wrong side?
—–
You are an idiot for posing the same question that’s been answered already.
July 20th, 2010 at 8:28 am
> Maybe he’s missing this?
Interesting, the house pictured there was featured on burbed (and is now on the market).
July 20th, 2010 at 9:47 am
Good catch, PG!
July 20th, 2010 at 11:42 am
Excellent, PG! You really are a Palo Alto expert! Tell me, is this house on the right or the wrong side of Middlefield?
JK. Everyone knows Sierra Court is practically on the 101 access ramp, and therefore it is on the wrong side. Not only EZ-Freeway Access on AND off, but in a flood zone too!
Wow, price cut a whopping $20K 11 days after a $30K cut. And the place sold in Aug 2009 for $845K. Still $200K above year-ago pricing. Must be something in those freeway fumes. Is 2375 Sierra the 96 Buckingham of Palo Alto? Or is Sierra Ct the equivalent of Hurlingame?
July 20th, 2010 at 9:08 pm
Pralay says,
>>You are an idiot for posing the same question that’s been answered already.
No, you are a chicken for not answering the question. Here is another examples of your unanswered question:
What’s your excuse for not buying when prices are down?
July 20th, 2010 at 9:10 pm
>>it’s hilarious people actually believe real estater lives in palo alto.
Applying the Pralay translation: Palo Alto is such an ass-kicking nice place!
July 20th, 2010 at 9:18 pm
mike – he isn’t lying. What’s hilarious is how hard he tries to belong, despite the fact that he owns.
I personally don’t see why, his neighbors are just as much on the wrong side of Middlefield as he is.
July 20th, 2010 at 9:20 pm
DreamT,
The grape is very very sour indeed!
July 20th, 2010 at 9:23 pm
What’s your excuse for not buying when prices are down?
—–
You are an idiot for posing the same question that’s been answered already.
July 20th, 2010 at 9:26 pm
Real Estater – Wonderful, because I can help!
July 20th, 2010 at 9:28 pm
What’s hilarious is how hard he tries to belong, despite the fact that he owns.
—-
Well, that’s what happens when everybody questions someone’s comprehension skill, ability to reasoning, ability to think rationally and suspects he is suffering from Dunning–Kruger effect. So the only things left (and he can talk about) are his zipcode and fictitious mega-project.
July 20th, 2010 at 9:31 pm
>>You are an idiot for posing the same question that’s been answered already.
Try convincing the IRS that evading taxes is the same as having paid for taxes already.
July 20th, 2010 at 9:35 pm
Pralay says,
>>So the only things left (and he can talk about) are his zipcode and fictitious mega-project.
How about let’s talk about your prestigious rental and/or impotence…I mean incompetence?
July 20th, 2010 at 9:37 pm
Pralay,
What’s your excuse for not having a kid after 3 years on Burbed? At least Bob comes clean by giving his reason. We haven’t heard yours.
July 20th, 2010 at 9:40 pm
>>it’s hilarious people actually believe real estater lives in palo alto.
Applying the Pralay translation: Palo Alto is such an ass-kicking nice place!
—–
Actually that’s Real Estater’s own translation. My translation would be something like this:
I guess Real Estater is the only dumbo in 94301 who has to make lot of effort to convince people he lives there. While Steve Jobs is making money by selling iPhone and iPad, his neighbor spending lots of time in Burbed to convince how he can double his home value by building 2nd home in his lot and he can “sleep smiling every night” thinking about it.
July 20th, 2010 at 9:41 pm
Try convincing the IRS that evading taxes is the same as having paid for taxes already.
—-
Real Estater = Used car salesman.
He is not IRS. Trust me.
July 20th, 2010 at 9:46 pm
What’s your excuse for not having a kid after 3 years on Burbed?
—-
LOL! Does Burbed requires mandatory announcement if someone had (or having) kid? Or Burbed requires someone to have kid if he/she is visiting this site for 3 years? Which one?
I guess that’s just another Dunning–Kruger effect.
July 20th, 2010 at 9:52 pm
It could be Dunning–Kruger effect or it could be as bad as nomadic described in other thread
July 20th, 2010 at 9:59 pm
Well, who else would answer madhaus’ question about the “right” side of a street in a literal way?
July 20th, 2010 at 10:26 pm
>>LOL! Does Burbed requires mandatory announcement if someone had (or having) kid?
Certainly Burbed does not require perpetuation evasion. When someone continues to evade a question, it’s as good as having answered it.
July 20th, 2010 at 10:36 pm
When someone continues to evade a question, it’s as good as having answered it.
—–
Erroneous conclusions due to either Dunning–Kruger effect or sidewalk concrete effect.
July 20th, 2010 at 11:44 pm
Real Estater- You are the master of evasion.
July 21st, 2010 at 8:11 pm
A well-rounded student from Palo Alto High School not only went to Harvard, he is now going to play for the Warriors!
July 21st, 2010 at 10:27 pm
> [Real Estater's usual Palo Alto stuff]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pXfHLUlZf4
July 21st, 2010 at 10:31 pm
#93, was that as good for #92 as it was for you?
Love & xxxx, #94
July 21st, 2010 at 10:47 pm
> #93, was that as good for #92 as it was for you?
I was literally unmoved by the new Warriors recruit. But I guess Real Estater gets turned on by anything that says Palo Alto on it
July 21st, 2010 at 11:05 pm
I enjoyed the video, but why does he keep spilling juice on his pants?
July 21st, 2010 at 11:11 pm
A well-rounded student from Palo Alto High School not only went to Harvard, he is now going to play for the Warriors!
—–
Oh, that’s just an Asian kid.
July 21st, 2010 at 11:18 pm
Pralay,
Thanks for the link. That reminds of recent news stating that online education will become part of University of California’s education strategy. You guys were laughing when I first brought up the concept. Now we know who is the visionary and who is the joker.
July 21st, 2010 at 11:28 pm
That reminds of recent news stating that online education will become part of University of California’s education strategy. You guys were laughing when I first brought up the concept. Now we know who is the visionary and who is the joker.
—–
Let’s call it bullshit.
LOL! Real Estater is calling himself “visionary”.
Thanks for the laugh!
July 21st, 2010 at 11:28 pm
In case you missed ABC Jizz…I mean News tonight: Diane Sawyer interviewed Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook headquarters in Palo Alto.
Zuckerberg said that he lives in a small house within walking distance of work (maybe College Terrace?). His GF is “just an Asian kid” at Stanford Medical School.
It’s amazing how much talent and money is gathered within the city limits.
July 21st, 2010 at 11:31 pm
>>Let’s call it bullshit.
Really?
July 21st, 2010 at 11:36 pm
Yup, College Terrace is where the insanely rich kid next door lives.
July 21st, 2010 at 11:48 pm
>>Let’s call it bullshit.
Really?
—-
Ok, let’s check it.
This is what the article says:
New let’s read what Real Estater said.
That’s why I call it bullshit.
July 21st, 2010 at 11:51 pm
Pralay says,
>>That’s why I call it bullshit.
Ask yourself some basic, dumb questions, such as: If something is not part of an organization’s strategy, would it even be piloted?
July 21st, 2010 at 11:52 pm
Yup, College Terrace is where the insanely rich kid next door lives.
—-
Just another rentard.
July 21st, 2010 at 11:56 pm
Ask yourself some basic, dumb questions, such as: If something is not part of an organization’s strategy, would it even be piloted?
—-
No, if the outcome of pilot program is positive in term of various factors including quality, it could become “part of University of California’s education strategy”. Just read the article. I doubt you even read it.
Your misleading statement makes you Real
EstaterMisleader.July 22nd, 2010 at 12:01 am
Yup, College Terrace is where the insanely rich kid next door lives.
—-
But don’t worry. If those rentards had kids, they couldn’t send their kids to YOUR school. YOUR school exclusively for homedebtors.
July 22nd, 2010 at 12:05 am
It’s amazing how much talent and money is gathered within the city limits.
—-
That’s creates more trouble for you to fit in your own city.
July 22nd, 2010 at 1:20 am
#107, #104 said you couldn’t send your kids to his school. Since you don’t have any kids, that was inadvertently true.
Even a blind squirrel stops a clock now and then.
Of course you could move to his neighborhood anytime, but why would you want to live on the wrong side?
July 22nd, 2010 at 6:38 am
Real Estater- “Now we know who is the visionary and who is the joker.”
Is this a joke?
July 22nd, 2010 at 8:45 am
#102 – why glorify a rentard transient? Just because he’s worth $2B on paper? lol
July 22nd, 2010 at 8:51 am
> Yup, College Terrace is where the insanely rich kid next door lives.
There is even a comment from our Emperor.
July 22nd, 2010 at 9:20 am
Ask yourself some basic, dumb questions, such as: If something is not part of an organization’s strategy, would it even be piloted?
—-
That’s just your dumb assumption. I am pretty sure you haven’t read the article yourself. There are plenty of people in UC who are skeptical about it.