Psst, Hey, Want to Buy an Island?
Burbed reader sonarrat called me over and slowly opened the trenchcoat. What illicit product could I buy? Darn, no chocolate, just real estate. Here’s what sonarrat has to say about today’s amazing listing:
I don’t have the time to get into why this is so great, but isn’t this a far better use of the money than some crap shack in Cupertino??
Indeed it is! For one, crapshacks in Cupertino are reachable by anybody. But this place is boat access only. For two, move here and don’t worry about truant officers! “Nearby schools are unavailable” per Redfin.
20251 W Bacon Island Dr Stockton, CA 95201
$799,000Beds: –
Baths: –
Sq. Ft.: –
Lot Size: 348 Acres
Property Type: Agricultural/Residential Land
View: Bay, Lake
Community: San Joaquin County
County: San Joaquin
MLS#: 81026676
Source: MLSListings
Status: Active
On Redfin: 134 daysSPORTSMAN’S PARADISE. The island is flooded with 350 acres of lake water from 8′ to 12′ and surrounded by nearly 4 miles of levee frontage. High recreational use for boating, fishing & hunting. Incredible bass fishing! Unique opportunity, call for complete brochure. High unused mitigation benefits. One owner, one island, one reclamation district. Big tax benefits. Possible Mitigation.
When a property listing mentions mitigation twice that’s never a good sign. 348 acres, 350 acres of lake water. That means two acres are flooded twice. No wonder it has a lake view, plus “water available at site” yet “Sewer not available.”
Let’s have a look at this SPORTSMAN’S PARADISE, with high recreational use for boating, fishing and hunting with incredible bass fishing. Perhaps the listing agent thinks the island is in Louisiana.
Unfortunately when the map is sufficiently pulled out to show the entire property (above), the lot lines vanish. It’s shaped like a wide rectangle running from the water curve on the right to the inlet on the left where the little tree marker is. Here’s a closer-in view created by merging two map images together.
Doesn’t look like much of an island, and doesn’t look flooded either. But why not pick this one up instead of a Cupertino crapshack in Rancho Rinkydinky? Then you can truthfully tell your friends and family that all your bass are belong to us.




October 11th, 2010 at 1:47 pm
Somebody set up us the bomb.
October 11th, 2010 at 1:49 pm
Wow – points for true originality. So what does mitigation mean in this context?
October 11th, 2010 at 1:49 pm
I bet it has something to do with litigation…
October 11th, 2010 at 3:05 pm
#1: Move zig. For great justice!!!!
October 11th, 2010 at 6:07 pm
Mmmm, bacon.
madhaus, I suppose the aerial photo was taken pre-flood. This would be kind of like buying a salvage vehicle, but you have get permission from the EPA and fish & wildlife to reclaim it.
October 11th, 2010 at 6:20 pm
Rising waters are always something to worry about when you’re going to build a property around water, but on the upside it does looks like the perfect cozy getaway.
October 11th, 2010 at 6:27 pm
bing.com/maps points to an island, to the west and north, which definitely looks flooded.
October 12th, 2010 at 7:52 am
This land isn’t even in the RSA (Real Stockton Area).
October 12th, 2010 at 10:43 am
A little back of the envelope calculations show that this should indeed be RBA real estate. Think of the value of the 12 feet of water alone: 348 acres x 43,560 sq ft/acre x 12 feet depth: 182 million cubic feet of water.
sfwater.org charges $4.12/cubic foot (the value of RBA water) = (wait for it) $749,000,000. For the cost of $799,000.
I’m sure that organic, unfiltered free range San Joaquin water will sell for even more in the RBA, and profits will rise with global warming!
October 12th, 2010 at 1:37 pm
That’s some truly imaginative spin there.
October 13th, 2010 at 12:52 am
Here’s the Bing map that #7 was referring to. Yes, it definitely looks flooded. And here is the same view on Google Maps.
Click on Aerial to see the satellite photo on Bing.