Lights Out for Los Gatos Painter Thomas Kinkade
Here’s something to deepen your observation of Easter. While devout Christians celebrate the resurrection of Jesus today, this man’s passing on Good Friday leads to a kind of different kind of immortality, and we are not talking about paintings.
Thomas Kinkade, one of nation’s most popular painters, dies suddenly in Los Gatos at 54
By Mike Rosenberg, San Jose Mercury News
Posted: 04/06/2012 06:43:30 PM PDT; Updated: 04/07/2012 03:41:26 AM PDTThomas Kinkade, the “Painter of Light” and one of the most popular artists in America, died suddenly Friday at his Los Gatos home. He was 54.
His family said in a statement that his death appeared to be from natural causes.
“Thom provided a wonderful life for his family,” his wife, Nanette, said in a statement. “We are shocked and saddened by his death.”
His paintings are hanging in an estimated one of every 20 homes in the United States. Fans cite the warm, familiar feeling of his mass-produced works of art, while it has become fashionable for art critics to dismiss his pieces as tacky. In any event, his prints of idyllic cottages and bucolic garden gates helped establish a brand — famed for their painted highlights — not commonly seen in the art world.
“I’m a warrior for light,” Kinkade told the Mercury News in 2002, alluding not just to his technical skill at creating light on canvas but to the medieval practice of using light to symbolize the divine. “With whatever talent and resources I have, I’m trying to bring light to penetrate the darkness many people feel.”
Now, if you want to instead refer to the Los Gatos Patch (an AOL-owned series of hyperlocal blogs), Kinkade actually died in Monte Sereno, while with his live-in girlfriend, as he had been estranged from his wife for two years. That would explain why his family was in Australia at the time of his death. Kincade’s passing is indeed relevant to the Real Bay Area, since he lived in Los Gatos. Or Monte Sereno, depending on which reported version you prefer. But this scan of the firefighters’ frequency shows an engine was dispatched to 16342 Ridgecrest Ave, due to a 54 year old male “drinking all night, not moving.” That address is owned by someone named Kinkade, and also had an “under influence of drugs/alcohol” arrest there last year. The address is missing from most property databases, though, including the Recorder’s Office.
Kinkade certainly has his staunch supporters and determined detractors. This Mercury News article generated 150 comments in just a few hours and had more than 250 by the following afternoon. Most Merc articles draw under 20 comments. The NY Times obituary generated an even more derisive stream of criticism, while the Washington Post put the negative commentary in the article itself. The daddy of all Kinkade-dissing news items has to go to this 2006 Los Angeles Times piece, though.
But there’s an aspect of Thomas Kinkade that had managed to elude us all this time. It turns out that his kitschy paintings of cottages in the woods inspired multiple housing developments.
That’s right, for the fan who isn’t content with buying a snowglobe or a throw rug, there were plans for actual tract houses trying to look like his paintings. And one of the first such developments, the Village at Hiddenbrooke, was built in Vallejo right as dot.com went dot.bomb in 2001. 
The homes were 1800-2600 square feet on 4000 square foot lots. The large photo above is interior décor from one of those model homes. Most of the links to the builder and the development in the Salon article are now defunct.
It’s not easy figuring out which streets in Hiddenbrooke are part of The Village. And given that the builder was London-based, that’s a particularly interesting name for a community accused of being somewhat, um, ersatz. Here’s a home that sold last year, and do check out its history, because it sold for less in 2011 than when it was sold new nine years beforehand. You can check out the neighborhood on Redfin but nothing seems to be for sale there now.
However, Kinkade did not stop with just the one housing development in Vallejo.
The photo at right shows the team planning for five Kinkade-inspired $4 to $6 million luxury homes around Lake Coeur d’Alene in Idaho named The Gates of Coeur d’Alene. This project was launched in (of course) 2006, at the height of bubblicious housing insanity.
Plans for 100 homes based on the cottage paintings were being developed later that winter for a project in Columbia, Missouri called The Gates at Old Hawthorne. Prices were expected to come in at $500,000 to $1 million. It’s not clear if any of these plans came to fruition, as the builder’s website no longer seems to exist. This 2007 article reflects the typical attitude of housing boosters, acknowledging the slowdown but insisting that It’s Special Here and full steam ahead for the Kinkade development:
The homes are being built at a time when the U.S. home market is declining. However, Columbia and Boone County have been able to avoid the national trend. The median price for new single-family homes in Boone County has steadily increased, going from around $136,000 in May 2003 to a little over $188,000 in May of this year. And while the price of new homes is rising, the number of homes being built has decreased from 79 single-family units in May 2003 to 52 this May.
“In general, our home market is good, (but) it’s not as good as last year’s,” said Brent Jones, president of the Columbia Board of Realtors. According to Jones, the present home market is a buyer’s market. The effects of the market are even more apparent in the sale of high-end houses, like the Kinkade homes. […]
“News stories give the idea that the market is homogenous,” Jones said. He cited cities that have experienced extreme home appreciation, and are now experiencing just as extreme depreciation. The Columbia market is relatively stable and hasn’t had the appreciation that other markets have experienced, .
However, market fluctuations are not a concern for HST.
“One of the reasons we came to Columbia is because Columbia’s economy is so strong,” Stewart said. Sales of the Kinkade houses are surpassing the inventory, Stewart added.
There is no evidence that either of these Kinkade-inspired home developments were ever built. Most references to them are from 2006, when everyone was drunk on Kool-aid. Here’s an application for an alternative use for the Missouri land, which suggests nothing was ever built from the Kinkade project. The Gates of Old Hawthorne website is gone, and here are some empty lots for sale from that project.
Just like the empty cave in today’s Holiday Story.
Have yourselves a Happy Easter, and remember: This means Spring Bounce has begun!
April 8th, 2012 at 11:33 am
Excellent! You answered my WTF questions!
For anyone bummed out that nothing is for sale at his development in Vallejo, it’s your lucky day!
http://www.myhiddenbrooke.com/featured.html#_5026staghorn
April 8th, 2012 at 12:02 pm
Thanks, nomadic, but the Kinkade development is just one of several at Hiddenbrooke. Only “The Village” are the homes you are looking for. If you look at this map, you’ll see that The Village is on the other arm of Bennington Drive (Summer Gate Ave leads into The Village). (Hmmm, the original development maps had Bennington looping through; looks like they cut the street apart.)
Yeah, there were several WTFs from the original Murky News piece that The Patch answered. I’m sure plenty more will come out, but how many people die of “natural causes” at age 54?
April 8th, 2012 at 12:52 pm
Awww, my dreams are shattered. The house appeared to have that faux cottage look Kinkade so adored.
P.S. You’re right about Bennington. It clearly is connected on satellite view, but is cut off on the Google map.
April 8th, 2012 at 2:15 pm
“how many people die of “natural causes” at age 54?”
My guess is that more males die of natural causes at age 54 than 30 or 85.
April 8th, 2012 at 3:35 pm
I knew his number was up. They always go in threes. Saddam, Osama, and Kinkade.
April 8th, 2012 at 3:49 pm
My guess is that more males die of natural causes at age 54 than 30 or 85.
You guess? Why would you make such a statement when the data are so easily available?
The median life expectancy for a US male, at birth, is 75.96 years. That’s AT BIRTH. Median life expectancy for a California male, at birth, is 77.80 years.
Allow me to suggest that 77.8, or even 76 years, is a lot closer to 85 than it is to 54. But why guess how many males die at 54 versus 30 or 85, when the CDC is already measuring it for us?
Here are the 2008 statistics for US males:
Number of deaths at age 30: 2,895
Number of deaths at age 54: 14,369
Number of deaths at age 85: 33,889
These are totals. If you want just the white males (which describes Kinkade), the numbers are even more convincing that death at 54 more unusual than at 85, and mind you, these are for ALL DEATHS in the US, not just “natural causes.”
30: 2,127
54: 11,334
85: 30,939
Go wild with CDC’s mortality tables if you want to narrow it down to cause of death.
April 8th, 2012 at 5:58 pm
Seems bizarre to argue that fewer males die of natural causes at 85 than 54… is the theory they die behind the wheel or from drug overdose (euthanasia)?
April 8th, 2012 at 6:46 pm
I used to take pictures in front of his galleries when on vacation, with a look on my face saying, “Really? Another one?” This was a big enough deal that I got multiple texts from friends telling me he died…and I’m sitting here reading that 1 in 20 Americans had his art and once again I have that”Really?” look on my face.
Regardless, nice piece of intrepid replying there on COD. I assumed he had a heart attack, would that not be considered natural causes?
April 8th, 2012 at 7:44 pm
“The median life expectancy for a US male, at birth, is 75.96 years. That’s AT BIRTH. Median life expectancy for a California male, at birth, is 77.80 years.”
A little higher than I expected. Without looking, I should have increased the upper age to 95.
April 8th, 2012 at 9:03 pm
“Seems bizarre to argue that fewer males die of natural causes at 85 than 54… is the theory they die behind the wheel or from drug overdose (euthanasia)?”
I very much doubt the distribution is Gaussian.
April 8th, 2012 at 9:07 pm
Well, natural causes just means that there was no outside interference causing the death, and it usually comes down to either illness or organ failure. So yes, a heart attack (which seemed to be the most common cause of death to 50-55 YO California men, and yes, I checked) would be natural causes. But dying as a result of intoxication could be classified as either an accident or a suicide.
There will be an autopsy tomorrow and I’m sure the news agencies will make sure we learn the findings. Also there’s a follow-up article in the Merc that’s still pretty tame given some of the other sites linked to above, and most of the comments are furious with the reporter for disrespecting the dead.
They also thought his use of the term “darker side” to describe the financial problems and the DUI arrest was overwrought. Too bad the reporter didn’t mention the separation, the live-in girlfriend, the arrest at his house, or the FBI investigation into whether he manipulated the price of his company’s stock.
Heh. They should read some of the other reportage if they think that’s anything.
April 8th, 2012 at 9:10 pm
I very much doubt the distribution is Gaussian.
One would hope you would have learned something about guessing these things. One would hope.
April 8th, 2012 at 9:15 pm
I’m likely right about the Gaussian aspect:
“The median life expectancy for a US male, at birth, is 75.96 years.”
If it’s Gaussian, then that’s the mean too.
“Here are the 2008 statistics for US males:
Number of deaths at age 30: 2,895″
So if the distribution were Gaussian, then there would be 2,895 deaths at age 121. How many people live over 100, much less over 120.
April 8th, 2012 at 9:18 pm
In regards to cause of death, there are four that I know about:
1. Homicides
2. Natural deaths
3. Accidental deaths
4. Suicides
April 8th, 2012 at 9:44 pm
Other causes:
- misadventure (fun things like being attacked by wildlife)
- war
- terrorism
- execution
This is getting away from Kinkade’s death, though. I did find an article about a 32 year old woman dying of a heart attack and explaining why that was considered “natural causes.” I’m wondering if the firefighter radio call did apply to Kinkade, how would a death resulting from excessive drinking be classified.
Here we go:
April 9th, 2012 at 9:58 am
His ‘art’ makes great house warming party gifts, especially in mid-century modern houses.
I certainly would not want that in my own place.
April 9th, 2012 at 10:35 am
I don’t get the hate for this guy. He’s a harmless purveyor of “art for people who don’t like art.” It’s not my cup of watery lukewarm tea, but if my wife’s cousin likes it, whatevs. As always, if you don’t like it, go to Russia.
April 10th, 2012 at 10:23 am
Ok you rookies
Myocardial infarction (potentially induced by coke binge) is still natural cause =pppp
April 10th, 2012 at 1:17 pm
In the spirit of this article, I must share these two Kinkade links.