September 27, 2010

It Could Be Winchester West

Today’s contribution is from burbed reader nomadic.  This property certainly has all the key features we know and love: listing copy in all-caps, problems galore neatly omitted, and a series of grudgingly small reductions on a WTF wishing price pretending to be a bargain.

11441 Eastbrook Ave  Los Altos Hills, CA 94024
$3,299,500

image

BEDS: 6
BATHS: 5.5
SQ. FT.: 9,000
$/SQ. FT.: $367
LOT SIZE: 0.53 Acres
PROPERTY TYPE: Detached Single Family
STYLE: Contemporary
STORIES: 3
VIEW: Neighborhood
YEAR BUILT: 1975
COMMUNITY: Los Altos Hills
COUNTY: Santa Clara
MLS#: 81031402
SOURCE: MLSListings
STATUS: Active
ON REDFIN: 93 days

$350K PRICE REDUCTION ON HUGE CUSTOM CONTEMPORARY HOME + 2100SF ATTACHED GUEST HOUSE = $300/SF IN LAH!!! * * * PERFECT FOR LARGE OR EXTENDED FAMILY NEEDING PLENTY OF SPACE * * * EXPANSIVE LIST OF AMENITIES INCL LIMESTONE FLRS, CUSTOM FAUX PAINT, LRG MASTER BED SUITE W/ SITTING ROOM, GOURMET KITCHEN W/ GRANITE, WINE CELLAR, TASTING AREA, 5ZONE HVAC, 4FPs * * (2)2 CAR GARAGES INCL OVERSIZED HEIGHT FOR R/V/WORKSHOP * *

Here’s what nomadic had to say about this house:

OMG.  It’s a freak of nature.  The noise from 280 is loud.  Very loud – it’s right across from the house and elevated for maximum annoyance.  It’s like two houses were glued together with a hallway or two. The listing says “2100sf guest house,” but you can hardly tell where one ends and the other begins because it’s just a double interior door, and then there’s a second kitchen back there.  The floor plan wanders from room to room with no sense whatsoever.

On the front, there are stairs with access to a roof top deck (see aerial view).  It’s like having turrets on an old house; you could set up a reporting station for traffic on 280.  It’s the weirdest house I have ever seen.  It could be Winchester West.  But what would you expect for just $367/sf in Los Altos Hills?

Thanks, nomadic!  Let’s take a look at that aerial view.

image

Yowza.  A half-acre parcel and the house seems to take up most of it.  And what little isn’t built over seems to be paved over.  Viewing the grounds from a little higher up shows this lot has been somewhat… subdivided.  And yet, no spec homes have sprouted yet.  Think of the excitement in buying this house, knowing a future neighbor could begin construction on another monster house just a few feet away from yours!  You’d better snatch that parcel up and put in Sarah’s Cafe West next door.  If the neighborhood improvement committee complains, give them all 25% off coupons.

image

Oh yes, the noise from 280.  This is an easy remedy.  If only the agent had the sense to use a more attractive map:

image

Problem solved!  Lovely riverside setting!

Besides, if the freeway is inconveniently elevated for maximum annoyance, that means it’s conveniently sited for tourists to see the large signage you’re going to put on the roof deck.  Remember, the original Winchester Mystery House is also atop I-280, but isn’t in the Real Bay Area part.  This house is full of freeway WIN!

Comments (9) -- Posted by: madhaus @ 5:04 am






September 18, 2010

WSJ’s Top 10 Reasons to Buy a Home

Many thanks to burbed reader nomadic for sending in this provocative essay. And if there’s one thing we can rely on the Wall Street Journal for, it’s got to be meaningless flamebait!

10 Reasons To Buy a Home

Columnist's name

Enough with the doom and gloom about homeownership. Brett Arends explains why owning a home is a good thing.
By BRETT ARENDS

Enough with the doom and gloom about homeownership.

Sure, maybe there’s more pain to come in the housing market. But when Time magazine starts running covers that declare “Owning a home may no longer make economic sense,” it’s time to say: Enough is enough. This is what “capitulation” looks like. Everyone has given up.

[roiA0915]

The Sept. 6 cover of Time magazine: This is what capitulation looks like.

After all, at the peak of the bubble five years ago, Time had a different take. “Home Sweet Home,” declared its cover then, as it celebrated the boom and asked: “Will your house make you rich?”

But it’s not enough just to be contrarian. So here are 10 reasons why it’s good to buy a home.

1. You can get a good deal.
2. Mortgages are cheap.
3. You’ll save on taxes.
4. It’s your house; you can do what you want with it.
5. You’ll get a better home then a crappy rental property.
6. It offers inflation protection.
7. Sooner or later real estate prices will head up again
8. It’s forced savings.
9. There is a lot to choose from.
10. Sooner or later, the market will clear.

I had no idea The Wall Street Journal was a wholly-owned division of the National Association of Realtors.  The calendar says it’s September, not April, so this isn’t a joke they’re playing on us either.  Either this writer just came back from a Kool-Aid party or he’s heavily long in residential construction.  Then again, it seems this isn’t the first time he’s made a complete idiot of himself just to generate traffic.

This is the most bizarre mix of naiveté, insouciance, and out-and-out Lawrence Yunnery.  Just as an example, here’s Arends’ reasoning for #5:

In many parts of the country it can be really hard to find a good rental. All the best places are sold as condos. Money talks. Once again, this is a case by case issue: In Miami right now there are so many vacant luxury condos that owners will rent them out for a fraction of the cost of owning. But few places are so favored. Generally speaking, if you want the best home in the best neighborhood, you’re better off buying.

I don’t know where these “many parts of the country” are, but I suspect they’re in places where homes are so cheap, anyone who can buy already has.  In high-income, high-housing cost regions, such as New York City, San Francisco, and Silicon Valley, rentals are readily available.  Knowledge workers are often on the move, and either won’t commit to buying, or simply rent their home out when jetting off to another assignment.

I’m sure burbed readers will find plenty of fault with this list, and so conclude with this simple rebuttal:

Top 10 Reasons Not to Buy a House Now

10. Enjoy the bankruptcy-free lifestyle
9. Can live close to work no matter where work ends up being
8. No public record in county recorder’s office of where you live
7. Time Magazine finally catches up with a trend that you’ve been ahead of for years
6. When you’re tired of being underwater, you just climb onto the shore and towel off
5. Three words that don’t apply to you: Monthly equity burn
4. You want to have all your cash on the sidelines with interest rates this low
3. Payback for those smug jerks showing off the toys they bought in 2006 from mortgage equity withdrawal
2. Landlords have plenty of people to evict ahead of you if you’re a few days late with the rent

And the Number One reason not to buy a house now:

1. It’s the economy, stupid.

Update: Looks like several burbed readers couldn’t wait for this article and the party has already started.  Here are some of the lists they’ve come up with so far.

From burbed reader Alex:

Top 10 reasons to delay buying a home

1) better deals are coming
2) mortgages will get cheaper
3) you’ll save more by avoiding the impending price drop
4) you don’t have to maintain the house (change light bulbs, draino) if you rent for a while longer; if your big sh*t clogs the toilet, just call the property manager
5) for the same amount of money, you can get a much better rental than a crappy house
6) you’re protected against deflation
7) it’s forced saving by not throwing your money away at depreciating assets
8) real estate ain’t going up for a loooooong time
9) there will be even more to choose from in a few years
10) the market will clear in a few years when the shadow inventory is finally put up for sale and the government stop d*cking around with their feeble market-propping measures

This would be a perfect list if only the author had properly spelled out the word “ducking.”

From burbed reader DreamT:

Top 10 reasons to buy a home now

1. If you don’t buy it, someone else will. You wouldn’t want to be a loser, would you?
2. Grass will be greener than your current place, which has none.
3. You can mock the renters, or treat them with contempt, or just haughtily ignore them
4. Now you Belong!
5. Your wife’s happy. Your kid’s happy. If your family’s normal, you’re therefore happy.
6. Nothing worse than idle money sitting on a savings account. Make it work for you! An empty savings account is a good savings account.
7. [Another burbed reader] will be your friend, or your BFF if you’re Chinese and like to eat at Dynasty.
8. You’ll get promoted, just like [Another burbed reader]. It’s inevitable.
9. You can stop wondering when is a good time to buy. Done!
10. You missed your chance yesterday. Care to make the same mistake again today?

Top 10 reasons not to buy a home

1. Surprise – you don’t own it – the bank does, then whomever you pay property tax to who can repossess your property.
2. No matter how many times you water the plants, they still die – or they grow too fast.
3. That roof shingle flew off again, and what’s up with that toilet anyway. Oops, what’s that sound, was that the tree?
4. You’d only get pissed off at the renters who don’t keep up their grass and litter the sidewalk. Not to mention the ruffians who dare walk on Your neighborhood park.
5. There’s no money left for a good old hostile takeover.
6. You can walk away when the meth lab in the garage explodes. The owner’ll clean it up.
7. You’ll have enough money left to buy that promotion.
8. You don’t have to suffer any kind of kinship to [Another burbed reader].
9. You can mock the homeowners who turn blue every time a foreclosure rears its ugly head in the neighborhood. And nothing compels you to check zillow valuations six times a day.
10. You were smart enough not to buy in 2006, you’re not going to be dumb enough to buy now!

Please add your owns lists on the best reasons to buy or not to buy.  That is today’s question.

Comments (29) -- Posted by: madhaus @ 5:19 am

May 30, 2010

Backyard Cottages: Threat or Menace?

Here’s an article sent in by burbed reader nomadic, who writes, “The RBA needs backyard cottages too!  I bet Worried Mom would be happy to live in a cottage in her backyard while she rents out the main house to cover college tuition for her kids.”

This is another crazy idea from Seattle, which brought us too much coffee, Windows Vista, and not enough sunshine.  Why would we in the RBA (Real Bay Area) want to use them as a role model (we’re doing a great job this year on that last one)?

Seattle’s backyard cottages make a dent in housing need

John Stoeck sweeps the 437-square-foot cottage he's building behind
 his home in Seattle. The city changed zoning rules to allow cottages in
 single-family neighborhoods.

<< John Stoeck sweeps the 437-square-foot cottage he’s building behind his home in Seattle. The city changed zoning rules to allow cottages in single-family neighborhoods.  

Lynn Watkins, left, and her partner, Yolinda Ward, built a 
600-square-foot cottage behind their four-bedroom Craftsman-style house 
after deciding the "big house" was too big.

>> Lynn Watkins, left, and her partner, Yolinda Ward, built a 600-square-foot cottage behind their four-bedroom Craftsman-style house after deciding the "big house" was too big.

By Judy Keen, USA TODAY

SEATTLE — John Stoeck is building a one-bedroom, 437-square-foot cottage on the spot where his garage stood before a tree fell on it. Construction costs: about $50,000. When the cottage is finished this summer, he plans to rent it for at least $900 a month, which will make a nice dent in his mortgage payments.

His is just one of about 50 tiny cottages sprouting in backyards across the city as it tries to expand affordable housing options in established neighborhoods without resorting to high rises and apartment complexes. The city changed zoning rules to allow cottages in single-family neighborhoods citywide, rejected a proposed cap of 50 cottages a year and helped organize a design competition to spur creation of reasonably priced plans. The point is not just to allow the cottages, but to encourage them.

They may not making any more land, but would this work in the RBA?  Would rental cottages in the back yard make RBA homes more or less Special? A rental income stream is nice, but how does a tenant a few steps from your back door work for you when you want to slip out to soak au natural in your hot tub?  How can you water your own lawn when your cottage renter tore it out to put in a garden?  How can you enjoy being lord of your manor when you’ve downsized to a 600 sf Craftsman cottage, and you’re renting out The Big House to an Angry Renter?

Would this solution work for Worried Mom?  Could it work for you?  What would your city do if you put in a permit application for one of these beauties?  Renters, would you jump at the chance to live in a cottage in a SFH neighborhood instead of your current digs?

Then again, this is the RBA!  Maybe we can make it even more Special!  Instead of Backyard Cottages, we could have Backyard Garages, and incubate the next Web 3.0 startup! What’s even better than rental income? How about ground-floor equity?  After all, it’s your ground floor!

Comments (8) -- Posted by: madhaus @ 5:02 am

April 16, 2010

Saratoga house waiting for IPOs to flow

Who says the market isn’t hot? Just check out this sales pending courtesy of Burbed reader nomadic:

Listed at: $2,995,000

image

Beds: 4
Baths: 3
Sq. Ft.: 3,850
$/Sq. Ft.: $778
Lot Size: 1.96 Acres
Property Type: Detached Single Family
Style: Ranch
Stories: 1
View: Mountains
Year Built: 1949
Community: Saratoga
County: Santa Clara
MLS#: 80938564
Source: MLSListings
Status: Pending Without Release This listing is in escrow, past inspections and waiting for loan funding. “Without Release” indicates that the current buyer doesn’t need to sell a home to buy the new home.
On Redfin: 237 days
TRULY ONE-OF-A-KIND PROPERTY! FABULOUS PARK-LIKE GROUNDS WITH KOI POND, WATERFALL, CREEK, MULTIPLE DECKS, LAWN AREA & WALKING TRAILS. TOTALLY PRIVATE 1.96 ACRES IN ONE OF SARATOGA’S MOST DESIRABLE NEIGHBORHOODS. HIGH-END FEATURES THROUGHOUT THE HOME.
Here’s what nomadic had to say:

This house apparently really lost its specialness.  Some might say the price suffered a haircut, but my friends and I call it the “decapitation house.”  It was purchased in 2000 at the bubblicious price of $6.5M.  One might think the property was subdivided or underwent some other transformation to end up at $3M today.  When the agent was asked during an open house, she said “they bought at the peak.”  I’d nominate her for the understatement of the year award.

The house is pending now – not surprising given that it was quite nice inside and had a beautiful lot.  Another interesting aspect to note – in spite of the huge loss, it wasn’t listed as a short sale or REO.

I think this house is just waiting for the IPO market to gush again.

Comments (31) -- Posted by: burbed @ 5:23 am

April 11, 2010

What are the best real estate tips that you have?

Thanks to Burbed reader nomadic for this post:

Rumors of increased activity for house flippers have been circulating, so it’s time to share some basic rules of flipping.  Anyone who undertakes a house flip should be focused on using their funds wisely (think style over substance) and not tying their money up any longer than absolutely necessary.  In that spirit, these tips are short – inspired by a blogger who calls them “triplets:”

Use maximum leverage.

Always landscape first.

Brazilian hardwood floors.

Travertine all bathrooms.

Granite kitchen countertops.

Stainless steel appliances.

Red front door.

Staging: angle bed.

Plant bright flowers.

8s in price.

Plus a bonus tip for every seller based on my experience at numerous open houses:

Vacuum dead bugs.

What tips would you add?

Comments (22) -- Posted by: burbed @ 5:57 am

February 26, 2010

A colorful house in the colorful house of San Francisco

$875,000

image

Beds: 5
Baths: 3
Sq. Ft.: 2,136
$/Sq. Ft.: $410
Lot Size: -
Property Type: Single-Family Home
Style: Contemporary
View: Panoramic, City Lights, Bay, Park, Hills, Mt. Diablo
Year Built: 1906
Community: Glen Park
County: San Francisco
MLS#: 364602
Source: San Francisco MLS
Status: Active This listing is for sale and the sellers are accepting offers.
On Redfin: 24 days
Great extra wide property on quiet Laidley Street in Glen Park. There are two separate detached units, each with a garage. The front 3bd. 2ba. house has new central heating, 2nd floor deck with crow’s nest, ground floor studio, views of Mt. Diablo, San Bruno Mtn, and Bay views. The rear unit is a legal 2 bd. Each needs some work. 4 blocks to GLEN PARK BART. This is a short sale. Offers will be reviewed as they come. Open Sundays 2 – 4pm and Tuesday Tours. Call or write for other times. Come see!
Thanks to Burbed reader nomadic for this find!
Wow. This house certainly is colorful. Here’s what nomadic had to say:

Some people trash their house when they know they’re going to be foreclosed… these folks apparently decided to paint the exterior to vent their frustrations.

Seems that with tenants, the owners would’ve been able to keep up with the payments.  They originally put 20% down to buy it (according to PropertyShark).

This seems to imply that the design was in malice. Personally, I think this is exactly the kind of house that San Francisco is famous for – individualized, iconic, controversial. Just think of how this house is already cheering up this Friday at Burbed!

If you’re not proud of owning this house and its color scheme, then this house probably isn’t for you.

Now, to onto the nitty gritty: offers will be reviewed as they come. So, it’s definitely in your best interest to bid early and at a very high price. Otherwise, this could easily slip away. Maybe you should even go as far as to place multiple bids under secret names – each higher than the last! Now that’s a strategy that any realtor would approve of. Ignore the fact that there are no interior pics – it’s probably just too fabulous.

And, with the separate detached units… in a word… cashflow. Sweet sweet cashflow.

Happy friday!

Comments (22) -- Posted by: burbed @ 5:08 am

October 28, 2009

Who lives in this San Jose house? The Pope?

Sorry, before you read this entry, you must watch this video clip – Mike’s Marbleopolis.

6456 GUADALUPE MINES Rd, San Jose, CA 95120 | MLS# 80947514
6456 GUADALUPE MINES Rd San Jose, CA 95120
Price: $1,688,800

6456
Beds: 5
Baths: 4
Sq. Ft.: 3,857
$/Sq. Ft.: $438
Lot Size: 1.36 Acres
Property Type: Detached Single Family
Style: Mediterranean
Stories: 2
View: Green Belt, Mountains
Year Built: 1996
Community: Almaden Valley
County: Santa Clara
MLS#: 80947514
Source: MLSListings
Status: Active
On Redfin: 15 days
WOW!!! Fabulous Mediterranean Villa surrounded by mature Valley Oak trees. Expansive lawn plus areas to practice golf, a vineyard with 300 vines of premium cabernet grapes, & a regulation size volleyball court. Private setting with scenic landscaping. You will fall in love with this very unique home! Great for entertaining! Los Gatos Schools! Open House: Oct. 18 2:00-4:00

Thanks to Burbed reader Nomadic for this find.

Wow. Who lives here? The Pope? Just look at those columns. Ooh la la! Look how elegant that staircase looks as a result. Is this house shipped over from Italy?

But wait… there’s more! There’s this one:

6456a

And that one!

With columns like those in the bedroom, you won’t need any help because… heck… you’ve got columns!

So now you too can live in the San Jose Whitehouse. All you need are these columns.

Comments (7) -- Posted by: burbed @ 5:57 am

August 5, 2009

House Red Tagged by Santa Clara in Saratoga – great deal

19420 BAINTER Ave, Saratoga, CA 95030 | MLS# 80845205
19420 BAINTER Ave
Saratoga, CA 95030
Price: $2,500,000

19420
BEDS: 4
BATHS: 3.5
SQ. FT.: 5,000
$/SQ. FT.: $500
LOT SIZE: 1 Acres
PROPERTY TYPE: Detached Single Family
STORIES: 2
YEAR BUILT: 1999
COMMUNITY: Saratoga
COUNTY: Santa Clara
MLS#: 80845205
SOURCE: MLSListings
STATUS: Active
ON REDFIN: 262 days
BUILDERS, DEVELOPERS!!! A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO FINISH THIS 5000SF HOME UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN A PRIME AREA. THE SITE HAS BEEN RED TAGGED BY THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. SELLER HIGHLY MOTIVATED.

Thanks to Burbed reader Nomadic for this find.

Ok, I’m perplexed. This house was built in 1999? Really? I guess this house entered some sort of time space anomaly and came out at the end in 2009 half finished. It’s like the Series Finale of Star Trek: TNG where Picard keeps jumping through time to figure out why things are going wrong.

But that’s just my theory. This is what Nomadic had to say:

Here’s a real gem in Saratoga.  To put it in context a little bit, inventory is up 9% (month over month) and sales $/sf is currently $582 per Redfin.  This unfinished nightmare has a big lot but it’s a 5,000 sf shell that doesn’t have the basics like windows, a roof, etc. and they still hope to get $500/sf for it.  And I really hope the year built isn’t really 1999…  It’s also an odd flag lot that looks completely inaccessible to a road on the map.

Let’s take a look:

19420a

Huh. Well look at that. Good thing you have a teleporter.

So now you know what red tagged means in Santa Clara – it’s red tagged because of unusual phenomenon.

Maybe you can mine for dilthium crystals underneath!

Thanks Nomadic!

Comments (18) -- Posted by: burbed @ 5:38 am

January 31, 2009

Bay Area rental market prices and trends

Bay Area rental market gives tenants an edge
Bay Area apartment rents will soften and vacancies will edge up in 2009, giving tenants more leverage, according to a forecast from an influential real estate firm.

Still, the rental market here will remain stronger than in most other regions around the country, said Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services, which issued forecasts for three metropolitan areas in the region: San Francisco, San Jose and Oakland.

Those excess homes and condos, which M&M terms “shadow market rentals,” largely are bank-owned foreclosures purchased by investors who then rent them out. They are concentrated in the East Bay and some parts of San Jose, and are barely a factor in San Francisco.

Thanks to Nomadic for posting this earlier. Note that these problems are mostly limited to parts of San Jose and the East Bay – both of which are clearly not in the Real Bay Area.

For those of you who are looking in the Real Bay Area – how does the rental market seem to you? Gangbusters as usual?

Comments (39) -- Posted by: burbed @ 5:37 am
 
Page 6 of 6« First...23456